Skip to content

Comparison of Network, Hierarchical, and Relational Models

The Hierarchical, Network, and Relational Models are three fundamental database models used for organizing and managing data. Below is a detailed comparison based on key factors:


1. Basic Concept

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
StructureTree-based (Parent-Child)Graph-based (Many-to-Many)Table-based (Rows & Columns)
Data OrganizationData is arranged in a hierarchy (One-to-Many)Data is connected using links (Many-to-Many)Data is stored in tables (Relations)
RelationshipsOne-to-ManyMany-to-ManyMany-to-Many
FlexibilityLowMediumHigh
ExampleOrganization StructureBanking SystemE-commerce Database

2. Data Representation

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Data StorageParent-child relationship using pointersRecords connected via multiple pointersTables (Relations)
Data AccessTop-down navigation (Tree Traversal)Navigational (Following Links)Query-based using SQL
Key ElementsNodes (Parent-Child)Records (Nodes) & LinksTables, Rows, Columns

3. Relationships Between Data

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
One-to-OneSupportedSupportedSupported
One-to-ManySupportedSupportedSupported
Many-to-Many❌ Not Supported✅ Supported✅ Supported

4. Query Language

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Query MethodNavigational (Parent-to-Child Traversal)Navigational (Following Links)SQL (Declarative)
Ease of QueryingDifficultDifficultEasy (Using SQL)
Example QueryFollow Parent-Child LinksFollow LinksSELECT * FROM Student;

5. Performance and Efficiency

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Read PerformanceFast (if structured well)Fast (Uses Pointers)Medium (Requires Joins)
Write PerformanceSlow (Rigid Structure)Slow (Pointers need updates)Medium (SQL operations are optimized)
Data Retrieval SpeedHigh for fixed queriesHigh for complex queriesMedium (Complex Joins)

6. Data Integrity and Redundancy

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Data IntegrityLowMediumHigh
Data RedundancyHigh (Data is repeated in multiple places)Low (Uses links)Low (Uses Foreign Keys)
Data ConsistencyLow (Updates must be made in multiple places)Medium (Better than Hierarchical)High (SQL Enforces Constraints)

7. Flexibility and Scalability

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Schema Flexibility❌ Rigid✅ Medium✅ High
Scalability❌ Hard to scale✅ Better than Hierarchical✅ Easy to scale

8. Complexity of Implementation

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Implementation DifficultyHard (Fixed Structure)Complex (Pointers & Links)Easy (Tables & Queries)
Modification ComplexityHigh (Must restructure tree)High (Must update all links)Low (Only modify tables)

9. Practical Applications

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Best Used ForFile Systems, Organizational StructuresBanking, TelecomWebsites, Business Applications
ExamplesIBM IMS, XML DatabasesCODASYL DBMSMySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle

10. Summary & Final Comparison Table

FeatureHierarchical ModelNetwork ModelRelational Model
Data StructureTreeGraphTable
Data RelationshipsOne-to-ManyMany-to-ManyMany-to-Many
Query LanguageNavigationalNavigationalSQL
Ease of UseHardComplexEasy
PerformanceHigh (for structured data)High (for complex relationships)Medium (Optimized for flexibility)
RedundancyHighLowLow
Best Use CaseFile Systems, XMLBanking, TelecomBusiness Apps, Websites

11. Conclusion

  • Hierarchical ModelBest for structured, fixed data relationships (e.g., File Systems, Organizational Hierarchies).
  • Network ModelBest for complex relationships like Banking & Telecom, but hard to manage.
  • Relational ModelMost widely used model, flexible, and supports SQL (Used in MySQL, Oracle, etc.).

👉 If flexibility & ease of use are needed → Use the Relational Model.
👉 If strict structure & fast retrieval are needed → Use the Hierarchical Model.
👉 If many-to-many relationships are common → Use the Network Model.